Re: [APML] A rough comparison

[stephen pitt <lthuedk@pe.net>]

Thank you Steve.  It might have looked better if it went up her nose.

Stephen



steve banbury wrote:
> Wow Stephen --thats a nice set of comparison shots!!
> One question--how did you get that "film scratch" running left to right thru
> the Witch's chin on the 10D shot?!!
> 
> :^) Steve
> 
> At 12:50 PM 1/22/04 -0800, Stephen Pitt  wrote:
> 
>>Hi:
>>
>>And I mean rough:  Both images were made with 120 min of exposure.  The 
>>first at f5, the second at f5.6.
>>
>>
>><http://www.light-to-dark.com/witch_10d_sv105.html>http://www.light-to-dar
> 
> k.com/witch_10d_sv105.html
> 
>><http://www.light-to-dark.com/whead.html>http://www.light-to-dark.com/whea
> 
> d.html
> 
>>
>>They weren't taken at the same time.  But, since I stretched about the 
>>same in each, the starting signal was about the same, except for the 
>>near lack of H-emission response in the 10D.
>>
>>Unscientifically yours,
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo