[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] A rough comparison

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] A rough comparison
From: StarManGMH@aol.com
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 01:18:42 EST
List-Archive: <http://seds.org/mailman/private/astro-photo>
List-Help: <mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=help>
List-Id: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo.seds.org>
List-Post: <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sender: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org

Nice comparo Stephen! Looks like that SV105 is working well for you. Nice shot.

Gary

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] A few star trails
Next by Author: Re: [APML] OT: Opportunity 3D Images
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] A rough comparison
Next by thread: [APML] A strange ST-4 behavior
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread