Re: [APML] A rough comparison

[steve banbury <banburys@sonic.net>]

Wow Stephen --thats a nice set of comparison shots!!
One question--how did you get that "film scratch" running left to right thru
the Witch's chin on the 10D shot?!!

:^) Steve

At 12:50 PM 1/22/04 -0800, Stephen Pitt  wrote:
>
>Hi:
>
>And I mean rough:  Both images were made with 120 min of exposure.  The 
>first at f5, the second at f5.6.
>
>
><http://www.light-to-dark.com/witch_10d_sv105.html>http://www.light-to-dar
k.com/witch_10d_sv105.html
>
><http://www.light-to-dark.com/whead.html>http://www.light-to-dark.com/whea
d.html
>
>
>They weren't taken at the same time.  But, since I stretched about the 
>same in each, the starting signal was about the same, except for the 
>near lack of H-emission response in the 10D.
>
>Unscientifically yours,
>


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo