Re: [APML] A rough comparison

["Scott Hammonds" <shammonds@creatorsview.com>]

Nice comparison Stephen. The RG200 is a very nice film, unfortunately gone,
except the 60+ rolls I have in the freezer. Other than the slightly smaller
FOV, the 10D is outstanding.
How about a comparison of time spent on processing each image?
Scott Hammonds
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "stephen pitt" <lthuedk@pe.net>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:50 PM
Subject: [APML] A rough comparison


>
> Hi:
>
> And I mean rough:  Both images were made with 120 min of exposure.  The
> first at f5, the second at f5.6.
>
>
> http://www.light-to-dark.com/witch_10d_sv105.html
>
> http://www.light-to-dark.com/whead.html
>
>
> They weren't taken at the same time.  But, since I stretched about the
> same in each, the starting signal was about the same, except for the
> near lack of H-emission response in the 10D.
>
> Unscientifically yours,
>
> Stephen Pitt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo