Re: [APML] Fuji Films; Experience with

["August R. Orlandi" <walkabout@rockford.com>]

Glenn,
The NPH 400 is great for deep sky object. Has good responds to
reds and blues.
Hypered or not still give good pictures,the only difference is the time you
expose.

Augie


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Kolb" <jkolb@datawest.net>
To: <glennlray@mail.ev1.net>; "'Discussion of Film Astrophotography'"
<astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [APML] Fuji Films; Experience with


> Hi Glenn
>
> > I've just "inherited" a large cache of 35mm and 120/220 Fuji
> > film and wonder if anyone here can comment on the performance
> > of the following:
> >
> > Provia 100
> > Fujichrome Velvia 50
> > NPL 160
> > NPS 160
> > NPH 400
> > NPZ 800
>
> Provia 100 is an excellent daylight and star trails slide film.  Try
> shooting at f/5.6 for 4 hours to start and see what you get.
>
> NPL - never tried it.
>
> NPS 160 is also a good daylight and star trails print film.  Chris Cook
> has taken several star trails shots with this film.
>
> NPH - Never tried it.
>
> NPZ 800 is very good for meteors, and I believe that Philip Perkins has
> also tried it out for deep space work.  This could be good film for
> comets as well, especially if you want to shoot short exposures and not
> try to (or can't) guide on the nucleus.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jon Kolb
> Adventures in Astrophotography
> http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
> Life Member, International Dark-Sky Association
> jkolb@datawest.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>



_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo