Re: [APML] Rosette Completely Redone

[Michael Gartland <mgartlan@iconn.net>]

Dean....I am searching far and wide...<gr>...actually I was not a big PPF
user....I have about 20 rolls of PJM in the freezer and another 10 of Fuji
Super G 400 which was always good to me unhypered......here are two examples,
one with each film.......

http://members.iconn.net/~mgartlan/M42new1.htm

http://members.iconn.net/~mgartlan/M45new1.htm

I would image I would give LE 400 a try...which I believe is PJ 400 by another
name... Let me know if you have any other suggestions...

m.g.

Dean Jacobsen wrote:

> Very nicely done Michael considering the age of the film.  What film do you
> plan on moving to, and why?
>
> Dean Jacobsen
> www.astrophoto.net
>
> At 10:03 AM 1/26/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >I would like to thank Mike, Philip, Warren, Robert and the others who
> >commented on my Rosette image, which was the first new photons I have
> >collected in awhile. While some liked the version, and others did not,
> >all provided constructive inputs that were much appreciated and led to
> >two very important conclusions...
> >
> >1. I decided I did not like the result.
> >2. I had deviated too much and too early from the "Levels" approach to
> >the important early processing and stacking steps. This was not my usual
> >processing approach, I got anxious to get into Curving since it had been
> >working so well on all of the other images I have redone. What I had
> >forgotten is that I adhered closely to Judicious Leveling in early
> >stacking steps in all of those other images.
> >
> >Here is the Completely Reprocessed Image:
> >
> >http://members.iconn.net/~mgartlan/NGC2237new1.htm
> >
> >I have completely Reprocessed the images starting with the Raw Scans, I
> >have now used (7) 50 min. Exposures, and all had baseline leveling done
> >prior to and during the stacking process. I used only very careful and
> >minor Curving on the final image and only one iteration (almost
> >unnecessary) of the Mike Cook (I hope I got it right<gr>)  DNR routine,
> >(Smart Blur settings were .7 and 10).
> >
> >The comments on the lack of punch on the long expired PPF is even more
> >evident on this version, but the overall smoothness and more natural
> >look of this image, while maintaining detail and star color balance, is
> >what I was looking for. Also, the "Hue Chroma" effect brighter details
> >was avoided by going back to square one.
> >
> >Thanks all
> >and, of course, comments are appreciated.
> >
> >--
> >Have a Nice Day!
> >m
> >
> >Email:   mgartlan@iconn.net
> >
> >Astro Web Site:   http://members.iconn.net/mgartlan/Index.html
> >
> >
> >
> >--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

--
Have a Nice Day!
m

Email:   mgartlan@iconn.net

Astro Web Site:   http://members.iconn.net/mgartlan/Index.html



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>