Re: [APML] Film on the rebound- Petition?

[Philip Perkins <philip@astrocruise.com>]

I will certainly add my name to that petition.  My preference would be for 
a film with rather better OIII response, but I suspect that the chances of 
getting PPF resurrected might be less than having LE 400 manufactured in 
120/220 size.  Though if we are to go to the extent of a petition it might 
be worth raising a few options such as that one.  Of course I know what my 
real preference would be:  a film with the Ha response and general 
recording power of LE 400 but with the OIII response of Fuji NHG II 800! 
<g>  .. but I suppose that would be about zero on the list of possibilities.

--Philip


At 05:23 20/01/02 -0600, you wrote:
>OK, then let's try one. I suppose everyone the list would be willing to
>sign. How many are on the list? A letter fron a Senator sure couldn't hurt
>anything either. Like I said, the first petition I'd like to see is for
>Kodak to produce the LE 400 emulsion in 120/220 sizes. Perhaps while we're
>at it we could mention the importance of Tech pan film also.
>Bobby Middelton



Philip Perkins - philip@astrocruise.com
Wiltshire UK & Luberon France
Astrocruise - http://www.astrocruise.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>