Re: [APML] Mission Statement Change?

[Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>]

At 08:59 PM 1/17/2002 -0800, Chuck Vaughn wrote:
>...or make a new [policy] that is
>more in tune with the times. I prefer the latter.
>
>I repeat, in no way do I wish to see APML become SBIG list #2, but to
>ignore useful CCD techniques that apply to film and prohibiting comparison
>of CCD and film images seems counter-productive to me.

Chuck,

I'm in favor of a change in the official policy. I think CCD related posts should be permitted, as long they also relate to film in a substantive way. I think CCDers on the APML should strive to present suggestions for how to adapt their methods/tools to film. The film folks have little use for CCD info unless it benefits film based imaging, or helps us understand film better. There is a lot of common ground.
--
Matt BenDaniel
http://starmatt.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>