[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
From: Herm <hermperez@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:51:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <NCBBIINCAGDCHHONENHCMEPCDOAA.ireland@gate.net>
References: <3C4592A4.1C034DCE@texas.net> <NCBBIINCAGDCHHONENHCMEPCDOAA.ireland@gate.net>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

Well said Scott, don't go anywhere Robert..

"R. Scott Ireland" <ireland@gate.net>  wrote:

>I think Robert's participation on this list has been a tremendous asset to
>the group, and I don't even like it that his participation is coming into
>question in any context.
>
>As Gene pointed out, he inquired discreetly before joining (CCD vs. Film
>issue), and I think we are all better off for his being here.
>
>Scott

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
  - From: Alan Voetsch <critter12952@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
  - From: Gene Horr <genehorr@texas.net>
- RE: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
  - From: "R. Scott Ireland" <ireland@gate.net>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] The End of Tech Pan???
Next by Author: [APML] Sprintscan 4000 slide holder
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread