Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???

[Sean Walker <vze2c3z8@mail.verizon.net>]

Me too- i'm in the same boat as Robert- i don't shoot film any more, just
Silicon.

Sean Walker

> From: "R. Scott Ireland" <ireland@gate.net>
> Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:00:49 -0500
> To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
> Subject: RE: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
> 
> I would like to chime in and add my $.02 worth.
> 
> I think Robert's participation on this list has been a tremendous asset to
> the group, and I don't even like it that his participation is coming into
> question in any context.
> 
> As Gene pointed out, he inquired discreetly before joining (CCD vs. Film
> issue), and I think we are all better off for his being here.
> 
> Scott
> 
> website:  http://www.rsiphotos.com/
> email:  ireland@gate.net
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-astro-photo@seds.org [mailto:owner-astro-photo@seds.org]On
>> Behalf Of Gene Horr
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:48 AM
>> To: astro-photo@seds.org
>> Subject: Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???
>> 
>> 
>> Howard Edin wrote:
>> 
>>> And for that matter, why does Robert Gendler continue to cross
>> post messages
>>> on CCD images between this list and the CCD listserver? (no
>> offence Robert,
>>> nice images,  but are you not getting enough feedback there or are you
>>> attempting to highlight CCD superiority to film or what?).
>> 
>> (1) As someone else mentioned, Rob asked very nicely if he could take part
>> in our list.  While there hasn't been much lately other than "here
>> is my latest picture" he did stimulate some interesting discussions
>> about colour accuracy and thanked us for giving him a few pointers.
>> (2) Before joining the list Rob emailed me personally and asked
>> if he could
>> take part as he thought that there were things that he could learn
>> from this list.  I told him that as far as I was concerned for the
>> most part post-acquisition processing for both methods are very
>> similar and IMO discussions of this nature was on topic despite
>> the data being acquired by silicon rather than emulsion.
>> (3) Personally, rather than seeing less "this is my latest image" posts,
>> I would rather more "this is the problems I had getting this image
>> and these are the solutions I came up with" type posts.
>> 
>> 
>> Gene Horr
>> genehorr@texas.net
>> 
>> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>> Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
> 
> 
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>