Re: [APML] Why this discussion?? WAS The End of Tech Pan???

["Darin E. Fields" <dfields@wilkes1.wilkes.edu>]

Quite right.

And, as I recall, when Rob started posting to both CCD and APML, he
graciously asked the APML-ers if they minded/wanted/cared if he cross-posted
and the response was positive and encouraging.

>
> Robert knows we collectively have a lot to teach him, and he has learned
the craft better than the vast majority of people on this list. Yes Robert
has money and nice toys, but he has spent tons of time developing skills,
many of which would work quite well with film, and probably better than
yours. We could learn from him. He is an asset to the list. Very few of the
other skilled CCD imagers would tolerate our abuse the way he has. Robert
happens to be a nice guy.
>
> >I'm here to read, learn and hopefully when I can discuss the merits of
FILM.
> >Of course some techniques and methodologies are common between the two
but
> >it always seems to result in an argument over which is better.
>
> Competition among ideas can lead to better ideas.
> --
> Matt BenDaniel
> http://starmatt.com
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>