Re: [APML] Kodak Supra 400?

["S y z y g y" <syzygy@vnet.net>]

Philipp,

Yeah, after I sent my note I noticed how badly it was worded!  I hate
it when that happens!

Thanks to everyone for your input.  I sounds like I lucked out on the
film since it was a give-away.  I hope to try it out tonight.

- Bill

----- Original Message -----
From: Philipp Salzgeber <philipp@salzgeber.at>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Kodak Supra 400?


Hi, I just uploaded two astrohphotos made with Supra 400:

http://www.salzgeber.at/astro/pics/m42_2002.html
http://www.salzgeber.at/astro/pics/m45_2002.html

Here in Central Europe some people consider it the best currently
available
astro-film...

with best regards

Philipp Salzgeber

ps: what made you put the scanner into the freezer?
<VBG>

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: S y z y g y <syzygy@vnet.net>
An: MAIL LIST: Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Jänner 2002 21:06
Betreff: [APML] Kodak Supra 400?


Hello group,

Earlier this year I got 10 free rolls of 35mm Kodak Professional Supra
400 negative film with the purchase of a film scanner that I put into
the freezer.

Does anyone know how well this might perform as a long exposure
astrophotography film?  I guess my biggest concern would the be
reciprocity failure situation.  How might it compare to PPF 400?

If anyone has any input I'd sure be happy to hear it!

- Bill


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>