[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Guidescope thoughts...



Gene Horr wrote:
> Alan Voetsch wrote:
> 
> > I don't recall seeing this particular thread of
> > conversation before. Is side-by-side preferable to one
> > on top of the other? Any thoughts on this?
> 
> I've done it both ways myself.  In terms of system stability it is
> IMO close to a wash.  You have the problems mentioned by Matt, but
> this is offset by having both the payload and the counterweights
> closer to the CoG.  

The Losmandy DSBS is itself heavy (7 lbs) and lifts the main scope away
from the CoG.

> IMO the difference in momentum arm for the
> Dec axis is minimal, assuming good balance.
> 
> But IMO on top is better due to simplicity.  Less parts to haul
> around, easier to balance, etc.  The downside is more counterweights.
> 
> Gene Horr
> genehorr@texas.net
-- 
Matt BenDaniel
http://starmatt.com

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>