[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] Guidescope thoughts...
Gene Horr wrote:
> Alan Voetsch wrote:
>
> > I don't recall seeing this particular thread of
> > conversation before. Is side-by-side preferable to one
> > on top of the other? Any thoughts on this?
>
> I've done it both ways myself. In terms of system stability it is
> IMO close to a wash. You have the problems mentioned by Matt, but
> this is offset by having both the payload and the counterweights
> closer to the CoG.
The Losmandy DSBS is itself heavy (7 lbs) and lifts the main scope away
from the CoG.
> IMO the difference in momentum arm for the
> Dec axis is minimal, assuming good balance.
>
> But IMO on top is better due to simplicity. Less parts to haul
> around, easier to balance, etc. The downside is more counterweights.
>
> Gene Horr
> genehorr@texas.net
--
Matt BenDaniel
http://starmatt.com
-- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>