Re: [APML] 400F (was: Alternative Anti-Vignetting Photoshop Technique)

[Herm <hermperez@worldnet.att.net>]

Matt. that is an excellent shot taken with a c8 and a GM8.. but I attempted to
shoot M31 many times with E200 and never got a good image.. yet the first time I
try hypered pj400 I end up with a great shot without lots of computer
processing. I have a comparison on my web site between these two films on M33,
please check it out: http://home.att.net/~hermperez/e200_vs_pj400.htm

Note how E200 recorded more in blue and red than hyp PJ400, but note how hyp
PJ400 still recorded more white light.. so overall the hyp PJ400 did a better
job on this galaxy. I still prefer E200 for nebula shots.

Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>  wrote:

>Herm,
>
>Why?  E200 does a great job recording H-II regions.  See: 
>http://people.ne.mediaone.net/mbendaniel/gallery/astro/m51.html
>
>It is true that a bright galactic core will saturate on slide film, so
>masking in an additional short shot would be the answer.
>
>Matt
>
>Herm wrote:
>> 
>> Matt, I dont like using E200 for galaxy shots, it just does not work well.. on
>> the other hand its excellent for red stuff..


Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>