[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Sprintscan 4000 suitability?

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] Sprintscan 4000 suitability?
From: Herm <hermperez@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:31:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <3C3DC0FA.9649D767@starmatt.com>
References: <001a01c199f1$d777b840$0101010a@main> <3C3DC0FA.9649D767@starmatt.com>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

A true statement when dealing with the usual 400 negative films, but I have been
playing with hypered select RG200 and it "may" benefit from the higher
resolution.. I will soon post a comparison with hypered PJ400 on the Andromeda
galaxy..

The usual general photography advice is that you will benefit from 4000 dpi
scans if you use fine grained films (asa 100 or less) WITH good lenses AND a
tripod.

Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>  wrote:

>4000 DPI is overkill except for tech pan. 

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] Sprintscan 4000 suitability?
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>

References:
- [APML] Sprintscan 4000 suitability?
  - From: "Tim Kearsley" <tim@cirrus.demon.co.uk>
- Re: [APML] Sprintscan 4000 suitability?
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] needed- an excellent sense of direction
Next by Author: Re: [APML] 400F (was: Alternative Anti-Vignetting Photoshop Technique)
Prev by thread: RE: [APML] Sprintscan 4000 suitability?
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Sprintscan 4000 suitability?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread