Re: [APML]: 38 films tested (with REVISION)

[Wil Milan <wmilan@airdigital.com>]

Robert Reeves wrote:

> SPLUT!!!
>
> OK, that sound was the egg landing on my face.
>
> I said several days ago that my tests showed that E100SW seemed to have very
> little sensitivity at 660 nanometers.  I just looked at Jerry's page at
> ftp://ftp.cyberenet.net/home/jml/HTML/FOURFILM.HTM
> and it got me to thinking that there MUST be something wrong with my tests.
> Too many people are getting good pictures with this film for it to be a red dud.
>
> Well...I found the problem.  Fatigue I guess, because it is now plain as day
> that I looked at the film strip BACKWARDS.  Now that all three brain cells
> are functioning, it is obvious I was looking at the 15 second exposure, not
> the two minute exposure that I used as the standard comparitor between all
> films.
>
> I will look closer and accordingly revise the color slide section of my
> tests later tonight, but for now, I recant and say E100SW may not be too
> shabby after all.  I goofed on that film.  Sorry if I mislead folks.

Thanks for clearing that up. People have been calling me crazy for years, but I
didn't that I was *that* far gone. (At least not yet.... :-). )

Thanks again.

Wil M.
--
"When I consider your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars
which You have set in place, what is Man that you are mindful of him, or the son of
Man that you care for him?"  -- Psalm 8