Re: [APML]: Another new shot

["Mike Regish" <mregish@map.com>]

That was on PJM also. I know I planned to go for at least 45 minutes, but I
think I cut it short at either 30 or 40 minutes because the ST-4 error
readings were so bad. I used the time to thaw out in the heated barn. By the
looks of the negative, I could have gone a lot longer.

Mike Regish
http://members.tripod.com/~mike534
mregish@map.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick & Melissa Keil <liekcr@ibm.net>
To: astro-photo@nightsky.com <astro-photo@nightsky.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 04, 1998 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [APML]: Another new shot


>
>Mike Regish wrote:
>>
>>
>> I've added a shot of M65 and M66 that includes NGC3628. If you check it
out,
>> make sure you read the caption.
>>
>> Mike Regish
>> http://members.tripod.com/~mike534
>> mregish@map.com
>
>Funny caption Mike! Nice shot. I too just photographed that exact same
>triple galaxy shot during the last new moon a week ago. Mine was for 20
>minutes at f/6.3 on PJM. Yours show a slightly more detail. What film
>did you use?
>
>Rick
>"I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all nervous and
>give the wrong answers." - unknown
>