[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Film is not dead

To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: Re: [APML] Film is not dead
From: "GARY HATFIELD" <Starmangmh@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:53:48 -0500
Delivered-To: astro-photo@seds.org
List-Archive: <http://seds.org/mailman/private/astro-photo>
List-Help: <mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=help>
List-Id: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo.seds.org>
List-Post: <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <FGECJMBDBJBENNLHKDEBKEKEEKAA.fl.lusen@verizon.net>
Reply-To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Seal-Send-Time: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:53:48 -0500
Sender: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org

Way to go Jason!! LONG LIVE FILM!!!!!!!!

Gary

----- Original Message -----

From: fl.lusen

To: APML

Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 1:08 AM

Subject: [APML] Film is not dead

Look at the April issue of Astronomy page 64.

Fred Lusen

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] Film is not dead
  - From: Jason Ware <jtw@galaxyphoto.com>

References:
- [APML] Film is not dead
  - From: "fl.lusen" <fl.lusen@verizon.net>

Prev by Author: [APML] M42 Technique Comparison
Next by Author: RE: [APML] Number of APML members?
Prev by thread: [APML] Film is not dead
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Film is not dead
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread