RE: [APML] Wide field Packman nebula

["Andrew Clegg" <andy@w4je.com>]

Hi Alan,

You may also want to consider the MicroTek ScanMaker i900. It can do
glass-less scans of up to 8x10 film, and has a claimed dmax greater than the
Epson. I got one for Christmas and have been pleased. An example scan (both
processed and raw) is at www.w4je.com/machholz.htm. I think it runs a bit
more $$ than the Epson, though.

Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org
[mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]On Behalf Of Alan Voetsch
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 10:48 PM
To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography
Subject: Re: [APML] Wide field Packman nebula


Hey Joe,

Nicely done; tons of stars, dark background.

I'm sort of interested in the Epson scanner you use. Any thoughts on
it's performance you'd care to share?

Alan

--- Joe & Leslie Schaefer <schaefer@htva.net> wrote:
> I uploaded the new version that has the red level reduced. My first
> attempt was way to red. I also flipped the image, thanks Chris. I
> must be dyslexic this isn't the first image I have posted backwards.



=====
SCT Astrophotography: http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch/astrophotography
FS-102 G-11/Gemini: http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch12952/tak_fs102
& http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch12952/fs102
& http://www.pbase.com/avoetsch12952/takpf



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo