Re: [APML] Number of APML members?

[steve banbury <banburys@sonic.net>]

I agree with Jerry.
I belong to a bunch of Yahoo Groups on specialized topics, and the sheer 
volume of posts
is overwhelming. I can seldom spare the time to wade thru them for the 
gold nuggets
of information that are surely there. The gold nugget to chaff ratio is 
much higher on the APML
and CCD lists. The pioneers are still here, and still willing to share 
their advice with us beginners.
Why change anything?

Steve

Jerry Lodriguss wrote:

>
> I don't see any reason to turn the APML into a CCD and CMOS discussion 
> list. There are already lists that specialize in that.
>
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo