[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Widefield Orion Blend/Luminance layer



Hi Stuart and thanks,

They both kinda did...that is the E200 without the
filter and the TP excluding the fog layer which only
really produced the halos.

The E200 shot produced a fair amount of red, but it
needed a boost.
I cranked the contrast on the TP shot which after
stacking, brought out more of the faint nebulosity in
the E200....especially the fainter stuff inside the
loop.
The TP was a little less nebula saturated because of
the city light polloution below it...I had to Use a
pretty dark gradiant to fix that one and you can
somewhat tell that the lower half of Barnards loop is
a bit dimmer because of it.

Sorry bout the mixup on exposure data,..it 7mins with
the fog filter, 12 mins straight E200 shot and 25 with
the TP.

Thanks!
Brian

> Brian - gorgeous shot! Did the Techpan with deep red
> filter add a lot of
> the red in the photo or did E200 get a lot of it?
> I've got E200 but am
> not Techpan enabled. Also, the text is a bit
> confusing. Is this really 3
> shots, two on E200 (12 min no filter, 7 min fog
> filter) then another
> shot with Techpan and the red filter?
> 
> Stuart Heggie
>
http://www3.sympatico.ca/stuart.j.heggie/Stuart.J.Heggie/
> Flesherton, Ontario, Canada
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian larmay" <power_windows4789@yahoo.com>
> To: "APML" <astro-photo@seds.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 6:37 PM
> Subject: [APML] Widefield Orion Blend/Luminance
> layer
> 
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Heres an experiment I was working on tonight
> combining
> > an old E200 shot and last nights techpan red
> filter
> > efforts,(cant find my H-a filter anywhere..ACK!).
> >
> > This is my first attempt on stacking a luminance
> layer
> > to anything Ive done so advice would be apreciated
> if
> > anyone sees anything lacking.
> >
> > The upper portion is a bit dark on this particular
> > stack due to somthing Im not quite aware of yet<g>
> > ...probably a gradiant mishap.
> > My personal opinion on this is that I could have
> gone
> > deeper on both shots, but its still interesting
> what a
> > luminance layer can do!
> >
> > http://www.astrobri.com/orion.htm
> >
> > Anyways, comments welcome
> > Brian
> >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Homepage: www.astrobri.com
> >
> > Location:
> > Niagara Falls USA
> > geographic Longitude = 79W
> > Geographic Latitude = 43N
> > Corrected Magnetic Latitude = 53N
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing
> online.
> > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
> > _______________________________________________
> > Astro-Photo mailing list
> > Astro-Photo@seds.org
> > http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo


=====
Homepage: www.astrobri.com

Location: 
Niagara Falls USA
geographic Longitude = 79W
Geographic Latitude = 43N
Corrected Magnetic Latitude = 53N

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo