Re: [APML] Re: Cepheus Deconvolved

[Vicent Peris <vicentperis@ya.com>]

Yes, perhaps this can be more effective with primary focus photos, when the 
resolution is limited by seeing....
I will continue experimenting.... :-)

VIcent.

At 02:01 26/02/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>At 17:14 25/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>Hi Vincent,
>>
>>Personally, I still like the image better at
>>
>>http://www.cepheusastrophoto.com/APML/CepheusWavelet0.jpg
>>
>>I think CepheusWavelet0.jpg has better stellar resolution.
>>
>>Jerry
>
>I agree. I think a wavelet decomposition is of limited usage for this 
>image. In your image, there are numerous stellar images which are so small 
>(high frequency features) that they can be easily taken as noise in a 
>hierarchical wavelet analysis.
>
>However, I'm very interested in your results because we are working on a 
>wavelets algorithm to be part of the next version of SGBNR. Keep us informed.
>______________________________________
>Juan Conejero, Pleiades Astrophoto
>skycad@ctv.es
>http://www.pleiades-astrophoto.com/en.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Astro-Photo mailing list
>Astro-Photo@seds.org
>http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo