Re: [APML] Cepheus Deconvolved

[Jerry Lodriguss <jerry@astropix.com>]

Hi Vincent,

I think that whatever you did, it worked very good.

Jerry

At 10:10 PM 2/25/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>I've used Iris, I don't have AIP or something else :,-(
>The wavelet separates the image in frecuencies. You
>can have an image with only tiny details, or only with
>big details. As the noise tends to have a high
>frecuency, you can separate the noise from the data.
>I'm suspect that I'm losing some finer details in the
>image with wavelets because I have eliminated the
>whole information for the noise frecuency, but I'm going
>to try to eliminate only an amount of this information,
>perhaps in this manner I will not lose the finer details.....
>There are techniques for CCD that can serve to
>film image... isn't? Any of the list that own a CCD
>can explain a bit how to apply the RL in a better manner??
>
>Vicent.
>
>At 15:37 25/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>Hi Vincent,
>>
>>The image looks better with the processing, but what does the wavelet do?
>>
>>What program did you use for the Richardson-Lucy deconvolution?
>>
>>Jerry
>>
>>
>>
>>I've tried to apply to the image of Cepheus
>>>a wavelet and 2 iterations of Richardson-Lucy.
>>>You can find the images here:
>>>www.cepheusastrophoto.com/APML/CepheusWavelet0.jpg
>>>The image without wavelets and RL
>>>www.cepheusastrophoto.com/APML/CepheusWavelet1.jpg
>>>The image with wavelets and RL applied.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Astro-Photo mailing list
>>Astro-Photo@seds.org
>>http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
>_______________________________________________
>Astro-Photo mailing list
>Astro-Photo@seds.org
>http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo


Astronomical photography: http://www.astropix.com



_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo