Re: [APML] Cepheus Deconvolved

[Vicent Peris <vicentperis@ya.com>]

I've used Iris, I don't have AIP or something else :,-(
The wavelet separates the image in frecuencies. You
can have an image with only tiny details, or only with
big details. As the noise tends to have a high
frecuency, you can separate the noise from the data.
I'm suspect that I'm losing some finer details in the
image with wavelets because I have eliminated the
whole information for the noise frecuency, but I'm going
to try to eliminate only an amount of this information,
perhaps in this manner I will not lose the finer details.....
There are techniques for CCD that can serve to
film image... isn't? Any of the list that own a CCD
can explain a bit how to apply the RL in a better manner??

Vicent.

At 15:37 25/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Vincent,
>
>The image looks better with the processing, but what does the wavelet do?
>
>What program did you use for the Richardson-Lucy deconvolution?
>
>Jerry
>
>
>
>I've tried to apply to the image of Cepheus
>>a wavelet and 2 iterations of Richardson-Lucy.
>>You can find the images here:
>>www.cepheusastrophoto.com/APML/CepheusWavelet0.jpg
>>The image without wavelets and RL
>>www.cepheusastrophoto.com/APML/CepheusWavelet1.jpg
>>The image with wavelets and RL applied.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Astro-Photo mailing list
>Astro-Photo@seds.org
>http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo