Re: [APML] Cepheus Deconvolved

["Bert Katzung" <katzung1@attbi.com>]

Hi Vicent:
Amazing image! (And there's some of Cygnus also in there, isn't there?)
It seems to me that the resolution of the wavelet0 file is *better* than
that of the wavelet1 file, at least the stars next to the North America
nebula seem better resolved. Is that what you expected? Or am I looking for
the wrong things?
Bert

Bert Katzung
katzung1@attbi.com
www.astronomy-images.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vicent Peris" <vicentperis@ya.com>
To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: [APML] Cepheus Deconvolved


> Hello,
>
> I've tried to apply to the image of Cepheus
> a wavelet and 2 iterations of Richardson-Lucy.
> You can find the images here:
> www.cepheusastrophoto.com/APML/CepheusWavelet0.jpg
> The image without wavelets and RL
> www.cepheusastrophoto.com/APML/CepheusWavelet1.jpg
> The image with wavelets and RL applied.
>
> Comments wellcome...
> Vicent.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo