RE: [APML] Celestron vs. Meade

[Alan Voetsch <critter12952@yahoo.com>]

Hi Dale,

--- Dale Ireland <direland@drdale.com> wrote:
> Thanks, the newtonian recommendation is interesting. I didn't know
> they were
> that much better for planets. Is this due to the smaller central
> obstruction and fewer glass surfaces? 
 
For planetary viewing it's preferable to NOT have a central obstrucion
as it reduces contrast. Even a 4" refractor shows more contrast and
detail on planets than my 10 and 12" SCTs. Light gathering is not issue
here. 

Alan

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo