[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [APML] Celestron vs. Meade

Thanks, the newtonian recommendation is interesting. I didn't know they were
that much better for planets. Is this due to the smaller central obstruction
and fewer glass surfaces? The problem is that I would like to avoid having
to buy a new pier for the 900 (or a big stepladder)
Dale


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo