[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] Teleconverter advice
Yes, if it's not too much trouble. I may still go with the TC-301 anyway,
since it's bound to be better than cropping and blowing up the images taken
at 300mm.
--
Alson Wong
Riverside Astronomical Society
http://www.rivastro.org/
Visit my Web page at <http://home.earthlink.net/~alsonwong/index.htm>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Kolb" <jkolb@datawest.net>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 8:15 PM
Subject: RE: [APML] Teleconverter advice
> Alson,
>
> All I can say is stay away from Tamron and Kenko. I did not test the
> Nikon TCs, but I did find that the newest Sigma AF 1.4x model worked
> pretty well with the Epsilon 160. If you really need it, I can probably
> find the test images I did with the Sigma mounted on the Epsilon, but it
> might take a couple of days (those were shot pre-CD burner). Note that
> not all lenses will mount on the Sigmas - the 35-70mm f/2.8 AF-D would
> not mount. I can double check both the 1.4x and the 2x on the 300mm
> f/2.8 EDIF AIS if you'd like.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jon Kolb
> Adventures in Astrophotography
> http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
> jkolb@datawest.net
-- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>