Re: [APML] Pentax normal lens for astro-photography

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

The 105's good. The 165 is very good. Here's a 165mm Orion shot:
http://www.koyote.com/users/bobm/orion%20widefield.htm 
Bobby M
 
> > I am going to add a "Normal" Pentax 67 Lens to my astro-photo arsenal.
> > 
> > Can someone offer an opinion of how the 105mm F2.4 and 90mm 
> > F2.8 lenses compare optically? Are they about equal, or does 
> > one of these lenses stand out a superior?
> 
> Like Matt, all I can say is that I'm very happy with the 105.  You might
> try emailing John Gleason - he was very helpful to me when I was
> deciding between the 165mm and 200mm.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Jon Kolb
> Adventures in Astrophotography
> http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
> jkolb@datawest.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>