[APML] PJ400 vs E200 (was New Images Posted)

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

From: Kolb, Jon <jkolb@noochee.com>

> I think PJ400 picks up blue better than E200, but not by all that much.
> E200 seems to pick up green a lot better than PJ400, and gives redder reds
> in my opinion.  Both are excellent films for astrophotography.

Since these two films are probably the "premier" films we use, I just
thought I would add my agreement to Jon's analysis of the differences in
their recording power. Other differences are:
somewhat faster speed and better sensitivity for the PJ, and finer grain for
E200. Having a good scanner to scan the slides plus needing to hyper the PJ
for optimum performance are also considerations.
Bobby Middleton


--  APML Archives at <http://www.system.missouri.edu/apml/>  ---
                Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>