[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] OT: digital vs film



Howard,
 
    This should almost be a direct email to you but I'll post it publicly and then shut up ... looks like there are two mind sets at foot here ... people who prefer to live within boundaries, be it their car club, their astrophotography medium, or whatever, and people who embrace a larger universe ... I am not saying one is any better than the other ... but there is a difference in outlook between the two. This may be a source of irritation but too bad ... that's what builds a strong democracy. I certainly accept your position but please understand that I don't want to be limited by it ...
 
     As for the APML ... I have been to the SBIG list sponsored by Yahoo ... what a joke! To view anything you have to endure an advertisement from Yahoo each time you want to see anything ... what a bunch of BS ... The SBIG list is great, but the medium of delivery is terrible ... to the extent that I seldom go on it. We owe Gene a huge THANK YOU for keeping the APML free from all that garbage.
 
     If you go on the SBIG list, you will see a long series of names that were once film people ... their migration from the APML to the SBIG list is our loss ... if you insist that anything involving a CCD be removed from the APML, you will eventually be a hollow shell as films are no longer made that will work for astrophotography ... is there currently a good color negative 120 film being made like PPF 400 or the great Fuji films of years ago? I'm not aware of any ... what will you do when there are no more films? Sit around and talk about the "good old days" ... ? I guess you could then say that only recollections of film be allowed as topics for discussion ...
 
           Tony
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo