[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] 1 more Pentax MF question
If you do go for an older 6x78
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Kolb" <jkolb@datawest.net>
To: "'Discussion of Film Astrophotography'" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 9:44 AM
Subject: RE: [APML] 1 more Pentax MF question
> Hi Alan,
>
> > Just looked through a couple camera store websites, and that
> > left me with this question: what are the differences between
> > the 6X7, 67, and 67II cameras? Is one more preferable that
> > the others? Sorry, that's two. 8-)
>
> The 6x7 is the oldest version, and not all of these have MLU. The 67
> was next, and all of them are supposed to have MLU. The 67II is the
> newest and thus the most expensive. I have not tried the 67II, so can't
> comment on it. Since the film transport system on these cameras can get
> stiff over time (as has happened on my 6x7), I would recommend going
> with a 67 that's in as close to new condition as you can afford.
> www.keh.com is the place to look to get a feel for prices.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jon Kolb
> Adventures in Astrophotography
> http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
> Life Member, International Dark-Sky Association
> jkolb@datawest.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo