Re: [APML] Photoshop CS

["Scott Hammonds" <shammonds@creatorsview.com>]

Kevin,
I posted a question about CS a few days ago. I upgraded my v6. on Saturday.
Is it worth $169? Well, version 6 works just fine, so... probably not.
However, the 16 bit support is very nice, it also has a visible histogram
pallet now. The histogram updates as you make changes, that's nice. I
haven't had a chance to check out some of the other features, but it has
some great new file features with thumbnails that are "resizeable".  I'm
sure a few others that responded to my post can address yours as well.
Scott Hammonds

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Wigell" <kwemail@twcny.rr.com>
To: "APML" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:53 PM
Subject: [APML] Photoshop CS


> Apologies in advance if this question has been posed before.
>
> I received a fancy card in the postal mail today from Adobe for Photoshop
CS, the latest version I gather. New features listed are "shadow/highlight
correction", "digital camera raw format support", "16-bit image support",
and a few others. I know the 16-bit support will come in handy.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone here has actually used this upgrade and can advise
whether it is worth the $169 US upgrade cost for AP processing work. I'm
currently using Photoshop 6.0
>
> Also, does anyone know if this version requires activation? I *hate*
activation.
>
> TIA,
> Kevin Wigell
> www.kwastronomy.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo