[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [APML] Laser vs. Star Collimation

To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: RE: [APML] Laser vs. Star Collimation
From: "Gene Horr" <genehorr@houston.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:31:50 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <000301c3b815$7fcb9be0$42b76b8e@DELLC610>
List-Archive: <http://seds.org/mailman/private/astro-photo>
List-Help: <mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=help>
List-Id: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo.seds.org>
List-Post: <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sender: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org

> I see... Have you or someone else on the APML list used the LaserMax
> TLC-202N collimator to collimate Newtonians?

I've used it on Newtonians and various Cassegrain variants.  The 
pattern helps a lot.  If you were dissabling optics regularly then
I would say get one - it will help a lot.  But you'll still need
to tweak with a point source.  

Gene Horr
genehorr@houston.rr.com

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [APML] Laser vs. Star Collimation
  - From: "Serge Theberge" <serge.theberge@wti.on.ca>

References:
- RE: [APML] Laser vs. Star Collimation
  - From: "Serge Theberge" <serge.theberge@wti.on.ca>

Prev by Author: RE: [APML] Laser vs. Star Collimation
Next by Author: RE: [APML] JPEG images displayed in AOL
Prev by thread: RE: [APML] Laser vs. Star Collimation
Next by thread: RE: [APML] Laser vs. Star Collimation
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread