[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[APML] Taurus Astro Camera [was Film vs Digital]

To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: [APML] Taurus Astro Camera [was Film vs Digital]
From: "Kevin Wigell" <kwemail@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 07:54:57 -0500
References: <007c01c2afae$51753000$788d79a5@oemcomputer> <07e401c2afcc$30ae6580$6464a8c0@astrophoto.ca> <006d01c2aff4$69f462e0$6401a8c0@sc.rr.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20021230070822.02e5b098@pop3.norton.antivirus>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

Matt BenDaniel wrote:
<<Our society is geared toward "progress". The vast majority of people will
dump a lot more money on "state-of-the-art" than they will on "old"
technology. For example, the new astro film camera by Taurus will sell 1%
(by $) of what SBIG does this year, right? Which company can afford to buy
more advertising?>>

Which reminds me - has anyone here ever actually tried Taurus' "astro film
camera"? Or did we all decide that it was hooey?

If anyone has used it, how about a short review?

Kevin Wigell
www.kwastronomy.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

References:
- Re: [APML] Film vs Digital - is film really dead?
  - From: "Chris & Jennifer Cook" <ccjd@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: [APML] Film vs Digital - is film really dead?
  - From: "John C. Mirtle" <jmirtle@shaw.ca>
- Re: [APML] Film vs Digital - is film really dead?
  - From: "Thom Iwancio" <tiwancio@sc.rr.com>
- Re: [APML] Film vs Digital - is film really dead?
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Film vs Digital - Not Just Astrophotographers
Next by Author: [APML] M1 and Saturn in same FOV
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] Film vs Digital - is film really dead?
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Film vs Digital - is film really dead?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread