[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] 'challenge'



Hi Stephen,

I think it will be interesting just to find out what techniques work well in a real time 
sense. A variety of experimentation is good....two scopes, one or two image series 
with one scope, or maybe simultaneous RGB series on each quadrant of a CCD since 
M1 and Saturn are so small and then recombining them. 

In any event it should be fun!

Brian Lula





 

 On 19 Dec 02, at 14:30, stephen pitt wrote:

> Brian and Chris: I understand the spirit of the photographic challenge,
> but also think that two scopes acting simultaneously and using only two
> frames is ethical.  Respectfully, Stephen
> 
> Brian Lula wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Chris,
> > 
> > I agree with you Chris. The real "challenge" is how to optimize this event real time
> > using innovative imaging techniques. It may not look as nice but that's not the point. It
> > also makes for a level playing field with Saturn's brightness coming in to play.
> > 
> > Brian Lula
> > 
> > On 19 Dec 02, at 15:41, Chris Schur wrote:
> > 
> > > I have to strongly disagree with those who say its OK to composite an image
> > > and think of it as anything like a challenge.  I can do that tonight, with
> > > an atlas for a guide as to where saturn is going to be, and thats cheating.
> > > Wouldnt it be clever, if we could think of a way to REALLY get the image,
> > > real time?  Not some pasted together fake, but an actual image.  I can think
> > > of several ways to do this.  My first thoughts are to shoot with the Ha
> > > filter and CCD, and determine the maximum exposure in seconds so saturn just
> > > doen not saturate.  Than add bunches of those, that can fit within a narrow
> > > 10 or 15 minute time frame so saturn does not move very far between shots.
> > > You will end of with (I hope!) a black and white REAL image, fully
> > > appreciated by your peers as a worthy effort to the upcomming january 4th
> > > challenge.
> > >
> > > Sorry I feel so strongly about this, but after Astronomy Magazine published
> > > the moon-saturn paste up a number of months back, I shudder at the thought
> > > of what things could come to if this is taken for granted.  I would like to
> > > hear others thoughts on this, the use of masks for example during exposure,
> > > or whatever.
> > >
> > > Ok, shoot me.
> > >
> > > Chris Schur
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-astro-photo@seds.org [mailto:owner-astro-photo@seds.org]On
> > > Behalf Of Matt BenDaniel
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:00 PM
> > > To: astro-photo@seds.org
> > > Cc: direland@drdale.com
> > > Subject: Re: [APML] 'challenge'
> > >
> > >
> > > Dale,
> > >
> > > It depends on the "rules".  You could take a long exposure of the Crab
> > > before Saturn crosses it.  Then you could take a short exposure of Saturn
> > > as it crosses.  Assuming you register the images on the stars, would that
> > > be "fair"?  It can even be accomplished without using any digital
> > > technologies (although I would).
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > >
> > > Dale Ireland said:
> > > > Saturn passes across the Crab Nebula Jan 3. That should be a real photo
> > > > "challenge"
> > > --
> > > Matt BenDaniel
> > > http://starmatt.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> > >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> > >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
> > 
> > Brian Lula
> > Polytec PI, Inc.
> > (508) 832-3456
> > 
> > --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
> 
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>




Brian Lula
Polytec PI, Inc.
(508) 832-3456

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>