[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?

To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: Re: [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?
From: "Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:16:32 -0600
References: <3DFE5FBC.4ACC228B@ix.netcom.com> <003401c2a575$f23966c0$19d2abd8@oemcomputer>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

I agree with Tony about the 105; it's sharp. The 180's f/2.8 have a good reputation but I get some chromatic abberation with mine wide open. My 50 f/1.4 is also sharp.

Bobby Middleton

----- Original Message -----

From: Tony Hallas

To: astro-photo@seds.org

Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:42 PM

Subject: Re: [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?

William,

I found the 20 and 24 lenses to be almost useless, the 35 was tack sharp at f/5.6, and the 105 was sharp at any aperture.

Tony

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?
  - From: Robert Reeves <reeves10@swbell.net>

References:
- [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?
  - From: "William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?
  - From: "Tony Hallas" <tonyhallas@foothill.net>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] M42 Mosaic Tweaked
Next by Author: Re: [APML] 12" & 14" LX200
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Nikon Astro Lenses - Opinions ?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread