[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [APML] ST-4 and the LX200

To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: RE: [APML] ST-4 and the LX200
From: "Gene Horr" <genehorr@houston.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:07:56 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <000501c2a2f0$b7945e80$c5d90644@sd.cox.net>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

>      Now, do you PEC train before every session?

I'm going to jump in here, but the answer is no.  My personal
experience is that hand training the PEC produces a smoother 
RA error/time curve than using an autoguider to train it, 
even though the total peak error may be higher.  This smoother
curve results in better autoguiding from my experience.

Gene Horr
genehorr@texas.net


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] ST-4 and the LX200
  - From: "ecdon" <ecdon@cox.net>

References:
- Re: [APML] ST-4 and the LX200
  - From: "ecdon" <ecdon@cox.net>

Prev by Author: RE: [APML] space email
Next by Author: RE: [APML] 12" & 14" LX200
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] ST-4 and the LX200
Next by thread: Re: [APML] ST-4 and the LX200
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread