[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] california neb
At 11:48 PM 12/21/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Thanks Dean.
>Yes the TP was hypered. That's a necessity for TP on deep sky targets. On
>the PPF, I've sent off some hypered PPF to Hallas lab for scanning and Tony
>seemed to think that the older PPF was loosing sensitivity to hypering. It
>(hypered AND unhypered) has also been very grainy. The PPF only shot would
>not have been pretty. The TP made this shot.
>Bobby
Thanks for the response. What method did you use to combine the TP [as a
luminance layer I presume] with the color data? Has someone published an
article on this dealing specifically with film that I may refer to?
Dean Jacobsen
www.astrophoto.net
-- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>