Re: [APML] california neb

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

Thanks Dean.
Yes the TP was hypered. That's a necessity for TP on deep sky targets. On
the PPF, I've sent off some hypered PPF to Hallas lab for scanning and Tony
seemed to think that the older PPF was loosing sensitivity to hypering. It
(hypered AND unhypered) has also been very grainy. The PPF only shot would
not have been pretty. The TP made this shot.
Bobby


----- Original Message -----
From: Dean Jacobsen <deanjacobsen@earthlink.net>
>
> Bobby, was the TP hypered?  Why did you choose not to hyper the PPF?
>
> Dean Jacobsen
> www.astrophoto.net



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>