[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [APML] Re: new photo from a novice



Dean,
 
Nice image, indeed.  I've used the "average" and "median" combine methods in
Registar, but I sure like the "blend" in PW better, since it adds depth and
detail while reducing grain.  I don't think with E-200 that you need *seven*
images just to reduce grain, though - man, that's really stacking!

Tony,

>    Lurk no more! Very nice image of the Rosette and I have a question for
you... how do 
> you guide with the Tak 160? You mention 35 minute exposures... most people
seem to run 
> into flexure problems with this scope and a guidescope with exposure times
like 
> that...are you doing something different?
 
I've been using the Tak E-160 for 3.5 years, and haven't ever had problems
with flexure.  I know that Chuck Vaughn reported flexure issues with his
E-200, but I've never heard of anyone having trouble with the 160.  The
scope is very compact and rigidly built.  My rig, which is very similar to
Dean's is shown here:
http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/equipment.htm

Sincerely,
Jon Kolb
Adventures in Astrophotography
http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
jkolb@mindport.com

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>