[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
RE: [APML] Re: new photo from a novice
Dean,
Nice image, indeed. I've used the "average" and "median" combine methods in
Registar, but I sure like the "blend" in PW better, since it adds depth and
detail while reducing grain. I don't think with E-200 that you need *seven*
images just to reduce grain, though - man, that's really stacking!
Tony,
> Lurk no more! Very nice image of the Rosette and I have a question for
you... how do
> you guide with the Tak 160? You mention 35 minute exposures... most people
seem to run
> into flexure problems with this scope and a guidescope with exposure times
like
> that...are you doing something different?
I've been using the Tak E-160 for 3.5 years, and haven't ever had problems
with flexure. I know that Chuck Vaughn reported flexure issues with his
E-200, but I've never heard of anyone having trouble with the 160. The
scope is very compact and rigidly built. My rig, which is very similar to
Dean's is shown here:
http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/equipment.htm
Sincerely,
Jon Kolb
Adventures in Astrophotography
http://home.datawest.net/jkolb/
jkolb@mindport.com
-- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>