[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Horsehead and Pleiades testshots with 6x9 camera/OAG and BRC



Errr..... what would that calculation be if the CO was 49% not 40% as reported?
Just curious.
Herb York
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Grant
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [APML] Horsehead and Pleiades testshots with 6x9 camera/OAG and BRC

misleading claims...Isn't that meades' department.?  God only knows
why Tak would feel they need to climb aboard that boat.
Grant

At 12:29 PM 12/19/01 -0600, you wrote:
No this is not good. I think that buyers should expect claims about potential products to be accurate. Many amateur buyers of telescopes are not knowledgeable enough in optics to realize the 2 micron claim is not possible in real life, and I'm in that group. It boils down to the fact that marketeers take advantage of those who don't know. It's not ethical or moral but it happens all the time. And this isn't the first inaccurate or misleading claim made by this particular telescope Co. Hint: "Image circle".
I've never been aware of any misleading or inaccurate claims made by AP. I guess that's probably one reason you can't go buy a new AP without waiting 2-3 years. I sure appreciate honesty in product representation.
Bobby Middleton