Re: [APML] reprocessed M31

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

The PPF version is pretty bad with grain, plus resolution is better with the
TP. But yes the core isn't nearly so burnt with PPF.
Bobby

----- Original Message -----
From: <tan@home.com>

> Bobby,
>
> Nice shot of M31 with very good resolution. I can barely tell that there
> is any miscollimation of the optics from the high rez crop. Usually TP
> in D19 as the L component will cause the core of M31 to burn out but in
> this case it does not appear overly saturated. I am experimenting with a
> BRC as well and will post some shots sometime. I agree, the BRC is a
> really high resolution instrument. I look forward to seeing more of your
> work with it. By the way, I wonder if a PPF only version might look
> softer, with a less emphasis on the core of the galaxy?
>
> Loke
>
>
>
> Bobby Middleton wrote:
>
> > I've added a brightness mask for the core to my M31 shot from 6 weeks
ago;
> > plus I adjusted the color a bit. And there's a link to a high-res crop
> > portion of the image on the page just above the image for those
interested.
> > In the cropped shot you get a taste of the resolution of the Tak BRC.
You
> > can also see the mis-collimation in some of the stars as a slight fan or
> > triangle shape. I will get around to adjusting that soon hopefully. Is
the
> > new version too dark?
> > http://www.koyote.com/users/bobm/m31.htm
> > Bobby Middleton
> >
> >
> > --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
> >
>
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>