Re: [APML] Reprocessed Witch Head

["John C. Mirtle" <jmirtle@shaw.ca>]

Jim;
    The Witchead is usually only shot on 35mm with short focal lengths so that
it fits on the frame. Your 1260mm version on 4x5 certainly brings out more
detail, but I think most of this is lost on the 600x600 pixel images. Not even
big enough for wallpaper! I try to post mine at 800 by something to show some of
the detail. How about if you just provide a link to a bigger image for those who
are interested? If you posted 1200 pixel images, I would definitely want to take
a look.

John Mirtle
Calgary, Ab. Canada

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Janusz" <jjanusz@dc.rr.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Reprocessed Witch Head


> Hi John,
>
> Thanks, the high res of this shot is nothing to drool over, maybe the
> re-shoot, as TP is usually very good.  The 180EDF is only 1260mm fl but
> cropping makes it look longer.
>
> What is everyone doing about resolution on Web images.  I post mine at 6x7
> or 6x6 and 100 dpi.  It was due to the old small download limit on Yahoo.
> Now that I have moved up to the pro version I have a 10gb per month limit so
> I can post them higher.  Suggestions?
>
> Jim



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>