[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML]: The difference beteween Mike Dismarmer and Nine Ninc
Jerry Lodriguss <jml@astropix.com> on Sat, 23 Aug 1997 02:08:37 -0400
wrote:
>>1. Simply records the beauty of nature? That is, the beauty is out there
>>in the natural world and a photograph merely reflects it?
>>
>>2. Or, is the beauty in the artifact created by the artist and the method
>>that it is recorded and presented to the viewer?
Fascinating. I think that both questions are true, because nature IS
beauty, and mere recording nature is the very first step; but the next
step, inevitable for the human beings, is to put questions about the
nature, and consequently to place renditions. Human mind is not a mere
recorder, in the end: when a personal elaboration of the nature (the
world, the universe) is made, the recording becomes perception, and
the photo a picture, that is an artifact.
----------------------------------------------------
Alessandro Vannini
a.vannini@mclink.it
Deep Void - deepvoid@geocities.com
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/7015
<< Nihil computandum a nobis alienum putamus >>