Re: [APML] Gamma-Cygnus taken with FSQ-106N

[John Laborde <jlaborde@ix.netcom.com>]

Title:

Wade,

I think your image, although very good, lacks image density. You should try
taking 3 or 4 images at perhaps 90 to 100 minutes and stack them. I don't
think a singer image will not get your all the subtle nebulosity in this
area and there is plenty of it. I shot this same area 2 years ago with E200
and TechPan.using a FSQ-106. Here is the result for comparison: http://aisig.sdaa.org/astroblogDetail.asp?imgID=282&UserID=67

John

Thomas W. Earle wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> Thanks, I really appreciate your expertise.  Although your starting
> points did not work on the original file.  I did make several
> adjustments which hopefully helped. Please, let me know what you
> think.   
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9qq8l
>
> > there is quite a bit of area with little or no nebulosity.
> >   
> You should check out Wei-Hao's deep image of this area.  It is
> filled with nebulosity with very few if any areas that are neutral
> (i.e. no nebulosity).  Hopefully, he want get mad, but here's a link
> to his spectacular mosaic of this area.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9tdpe
>
> His higher resolution image is just breathtaking.
>
> Wade
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo



_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo