[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] Two new widefields
Thanks Stuart,
Whoops, you're right, it's definitely the nose/foot binary syndrome.
It's amazing what you don't notice while you're busy focussing on the
details of processing! Thanks for pointing it out to me, it's pretty
funny that I missed it.
As for the strange aberration on the other shot, I've switched to my
backup 35mm camera and haven't noticed the problem since, but I'm
still curious why it was happening.
Thanks again for your feedback!
Colin
On 29-Aug-05, at 6:30 PM, Stuart Heggie wrote:
> Coliln, first off, beautiful shot of Leo! Nice flat field, tastefully
> processed!
>
> The shot of Leo, in the highest resolution image you posted, seems
> to show
> one of two symptoms:
> a) every bright star mysteriously has a companion in the exact same
> orientation or,
> b) you have the dreaded nose/foot binary syndrome.
>
> Is it me or do all the bright stars have a tiny secondary?
>
> Don't know about the other shot - film buckling would be my first
> guess but
> it isn't that common in 35mm cameras unless this was your second
> shot of the
> night and you had the camera out of use for awhile. The second shot
> would be
> the frame that was half wrapped on the rollers. Scientific Wild
> Assed Guess
> as they say.
>
> Stuart
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin Clark" <colin.mailinglists@sympatico.ca>
> To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 10:52 AM
> Subject: [APML] Two new widefields
>
>
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> First, I wanted to thank everyone for their comments on my first
>> Orion shot which I posted back in the spring. I really appreciated
>> all the feedback and constructive criticism. It's been a very busy
>> summer for me what with getting married and moving, but I've still
>> had a chance to do a bit of astrophotography amidst all the events. I
>> hope to post a number of new images over the coming weeks.
>>
>> Although I'm now largely shooting medium format with my Bronica, I
>> have a backlog of 35mm photographs still to scan and process. These
>> two were taken way back in April under the dark skies of Muskoka,
>> Ontario. Rather than being piggybacked on top of the scope, in this
>> case my Nikon FG was clamped to the counterweight of the Super
>> Polaris while I was shooting piggyback with the medium format camera.
>> The Nikon works perfectly to help counterbalance the extra weight of
>> the Bronica, and I get twice as many images per session!
>>
>> The first shot is a wide-angle constellation portrait of Leo, exposed
>> for 30 minutes with a 50mm lens at f/4 on E200 +1. It's not a
>> particularly exciting shot, so I tried a simple diffusion-style
>> technique in Photoshop to emphasize the brightest stars. What do you
>> think?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/75d6r
>>
>> My second shot is more of a problem. It's is a portrait of Saturn,
>> Gemini, and the Beehive cluster also with the 50mm lens. While I'm
>> pleased with the composition and general look of the shot, I do see
>> that there's a pretty significant circular area in the middle of the
>> frame where the stars are noticeably out of focus. Does anyone have
>> any clues about what it could be? Strangely enough, I've noticed it
>> in other exposures with the same camera, but a different lens! Here
>> it is:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/cxtyg
>>
>> As always, comments and criticism about the processing are
>> appreciated. Up next: my first medium format shots!
>>
>> Colin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Astro-Photo mailing list
>> Astro-Photo@seds.org
>> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo