RE: [APML] A new Processing Trick

["Chris Schur" <cschur@therim.com>]

Dominic, I used the defaults, with a .65 size.

 

chris

-----Original Message-----
From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org [mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]On Behalf Of Dominic Cantin
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 9:03 PM
To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography
Subject: Re: [APML] A new Processing Trick

Hi Chris !

 

What was your exact setting ? Box size , Iterations , Amount and did you checked the Circular Kernel and Use Luminance ?

 

Thanks for your help !

 

Dom :)

Chris Schur <cschur@therim.com> wrote:

Hi all,

While printing and viewing some of my latest 50mm film shots, I came across
a problem that the images were so high in resolution across the entire frame
as to have the stars actually disappear when they were seen full screen or
printed at my printers max resolution. Here is my solution:

http://www.psiaz.com/schur/astro/latest60.html

I hope you find it useful!


Clear Skies,

Chris Schur
Astro: http://www.PSIAZ.com/Schur/astro
Robotics: http://www.psiaz.com/schur/astro/roboticsmain.html

---

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

---

Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ? Yahoo! Magasinage.

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo