[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Opinions on WO FLT110 vs. Tak 106

To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: Re: [APML] Opinions on WO FLT110 vs. Tak 106
From: "Steve Lindsey" <stevelindsey@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:53:09 -0700
List-Archive: <http://seds.org/mailman/private/astro-photo>
List-Help: <mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=help>
List-Id: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo.seds.org>
List-Post: <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20030814043051.85647.qmail@web14303.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sender: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org

Hey, how do you guys think the Tak FSQ106 would stack against the newer WO
Fluoro-Star FLT 110mm?

Steve


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] Opinions on WO FLT110 vs. Tak 106
  - From: Michael Cole <mrcole@earthlink.net>

References:
- Re: [APML] Opinions on TV-85 vs. Tak 102-106
  - From: Alan Voetsch <critter12952@yahoo.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Opinions on TV-85 vs. Tak 102-106
Next by Author: Re: [APML] Film vs. webcam on Mars
Prev by thread: FSQ106 was [APML] Opinions on TV-85 vs. Tak 102-106
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Opinions on WO FLT110 vs. Tak 106
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread