Re: [APML] Kodak film use?

["Jeff Crilly" <jlcphoto@myrealbox.com>]

The following is quick&dirty M22 I did with supra 400, 15 minute exposure with an 8" f6 newt...

http://fototime.com/F6EF37E1D234B9B/orig.jpg

The scan of the photo was done from the *print* on a flatbed scanner here at work.

Ignore the "blue flame" (someone turned on a white light at the observing site.)
... here is a crop of the photo without the flame...

http://fototime.com/F17A75B52DD5699/standard.jpg

These are unprocessed photos (no photoshopping).
Also, Un-hypered.

Hope this helps.

I've shot the "old" RG 400 piggy back (135mm and 28mm lens) and the results were always a bit on the orange side.
This film seems more into the blue and the background seems black... though I havent shot widefield with supra 400.
Btw, this notion I have of it being more "blue" is sorta confirmed by this..
http://home.nethere.net/mpd/FilmTestData/KodakSupra400.htm

jeff


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Geary" <keithg1@eircom.net>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: [APML] Kodak film use?


Hello All,  I've recently purchased some rolls of Kodak Royal Supra 400 colour negative film. I seriously want to test this one
during the next new moon period coming up, mainly for piggyback use. It is a colour print film, not slide. Have any of you used this
before?, what were your shots like??
Thanks, Keith...

"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has
endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us
to forgo their use." - Galileo Galilei




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo